🔗 Share this article

The resident Tomas Anez Dos Santos was laboring in a tiny clearing deep in the Peruvian Amazon when he detected movements coming closer through the dense forest.

It dawned on him he was surrounded, and froze.

“One person stood, pointing using an arrow,” he states. “Somehow he noticed I was here and I commenced to run.”

He ended up face to face members of the Mashco Piro. For a long time, Tomas—who lives in the small community of Nueva Oceania—served as almost a local to these wandering tribe, who reject engagement with foreigners.

A new document by a human rights group claims exist a minimum of 196 termed “remote communities” remaining globally. The group is considered to be the most numerous. The study says 50% of these tribes could be eliminated in the next decade should administrations neglect to implement more measures to safeguard them.

The report asserts the biggest dangers come from logging, digging or drilling for petroleum. Uncontacted groups are exceptionally vulnerable to common sickness—as such, the report says a threat is posed by exposure with religious missionaries and social media influencers in pursuit of clicks.

In recent times, Mashco Piro people have been venturing to Nueva Oceania more and more, according to residents.

This settlement is a fishing hamlet of a handful of families, perched elevated on the shores of the local river in the heart of the of Peru rainforest, half a day from the nearest town by canoe.

This region is not recognised as a protected reserve for uncontacted groups, and logging companies work here.

According to Tomas that, at times, the racket of industrial tools can be heard day and night, and the Mashco Piro people are seeing their forest damaged and devastated.

Among the locals, inhabitants say they are torn. They are afraid of the tribal weapons but they also have strong regard for their “brothers” residing in the woodland and desire to defend them.

“Let them live in their own way, we must not alter their way of life. That's why we keep our separation,” says Tomas.

The people in Nueva Oceania are anxious about the destruction to the tribe's survival, the danger of violence and the possibility that loggers might subject the Mashco Piro to illnesses they have no immunity to.

At the time in the settlement, the tribe made their presence felt again. Letitia, a woman with a two-year-old daughter, was in the jungle collecting produce when she heard them.

“There were cries, shouts from individuals, numerous of them. As though there were a large gathering shouting,” she informed us.

It was the initial occasion she had met the Mashco Piro and she escaped. Subsequently, her mind was continually throbbing from anxiety.

“Because operate timber workers and firms cutting down the woodland they are fleeing, possibly out of fear and they end up close to us,” she explained. “It is unclear how they will behave towards us. That's what scares me.”

Two years ago, two loggers were assaulted by the tribe while angling. A single person was wounded by an bow to the gut. He survived, but the second individual was discovered deceased days later with several puncture marks in his physique.

Authorities in Peru maintains a policy of no engagement with secluded communities, making it forbidden to initiate encounters with them.

The strategy was first adopted in a nearby nation following many years of advocacy by indigenous rights groups, who noted that early contact with secluded communities lead to whole populations being decimated by disease, destitution and starvation.

In the 1980s, when the Nahau tribe in Peru first encountered with the world outside, half of their people died within a short period. During the 1990s, the Muruhanua tribe suffered the same fate.

“Secluded communities are very vulnerable—from a disease perspective, any interaction might introduce diseases, and even the basic infections might eliminate them,” says Issrail Aquisse from a Peruvian indigenous rights group. “Culturally too, any exposure or disruption may be highly damaging to their way of life and well-being as a community.”

For those living nearby of {